Nissan Qashqai vs Mitsubishi ASX

This is a useful car comparison because the Qashqai was one of the first compact crossover cars to be launched in the UK back in 2006/7. The ASX is one of most recent contenders to enter this market sector so it’ll be interesting to spot the differences and improvements over the past four years.

The Nissan Qashqai was launched at the time large SUVs and 4x4s took a dive in popularity. Since then the Qashqai has become a highly successful car in the UK. It was promoted more as a Sports Urban Vehicle distancing itself from then unpopular Sports Utility Vehicles.

Crossovers like the Qashqai, VW Tiguan, Ford Kuga and Skoda Yeti have revived the SUV, 4×4 sector as fun and family cars. Even prestige makers have entered this niche. The most recent entrants have been value brands – Hyundai ix35, and Kia Sportage.

The Mitsubishi ASX enters this sector with the ix35 and Sportage at prices to compete with the Qashqai which once had the price range to itself. All have significantly lower entry prices than the Kuga and Tiguan as well as the one time market leaders – the Freelander, RAV4 and CR-V. The Yeti is the cheapest.

Nissan Qashqai prices range from £17,000 to £23,000. The Mitsubishi ASX  from £16,000 to £24,000. No real difference there.

Both cars are the same overall length. The ASX has a little more load space with the rear seats up and even more with them folded.

Is there any real difference in engine efficiency?

The Qashqai petrol engine 1.6 2WD has a combined mpg of 42.8/44.1 mpg, 154 CO2s, 112 mph maximum speed and 0 to 62 mph in 12.9 seconds.

The ASX petrol engine 1.6 2WD has a combined mpg of 47.9 mpg, 135 CO2s, 113 mph maximum speed and 0 to 62 mph in 11.4 seconds.

These are lab’ figures so there may be little difference in real on the road conditions. However the ASX is significantly cleaner and slightly quicker.

The Qashqai diesel engine 2.0 2WD has a combined mpg of 47.1 mpg, 159 CO2s, 120 mph maximum speed and 0 to 62 mph in 10.0 seconds.

The ASX diesel engine 1.8 2WD has a combined mpg of 51.1 mpg, 145 CO2s, 124 mph maximum speed and 0 to 62 mph in 9.7 seconds.

Again little difference although the ASX is slightly cleaner. It’s the same story if you compare the 4×4 options.

The Qashqai does have a 2.0 petrol option which is a bit juicy and an economical 1.5 diesel which has a combined 53.3 mpg, 139 CO2s, 108 mph and 0 to 62 mph in 13.2 seconds making it the most economical and clean option.

With similar price ranges, size, space and engine efficiency there’s little to sway the car buyer if they particularly like the look of one or the other or finds the driver comfort of one is more to their taste. Both cars are among the most comfortable in this sector so it may simply be a matter of style.

If you are actually thinking of buying a car in this sector keep an eye on car insurance groups as you consider different models. If you’re considering a diesel engine calculate at what total mileage you recover the added cost of buying a diesel car with savings in fuel costs – you’ll find some big surprises.

If you too consider the Qashqai and ASX similar, both comfortable and stylish you may decide on the best deals for discount, finance, part exchange and add-ons. There can be a good 4 or £5,000 even more to be negotiated in this sector which can help contribute to later depreciation and running costs.

There’s also a longer 7 seat Qashqai which may also set a trend for the future.

It seems the Nissan Qashqai was a good idea at the time since proven by its continued sales successful which is underlined by many other makers entering this sector with very similar cars.

Regards
Ralph
carbuyersinfo.co.uk car comparison site revealing differences and similarities to help you find the car to suit your purpose and purse.
data date March April 2011

Why The Interest In Crossover, SUV, 4×4 cars?

Although there’s an enormous amount of interest in small cars today there is renewed and rising interest in Crossover, SUV, 4×4 cars.

Over the past four decades interest in small more economical cars rose every time there was an economic downturn or rise in fuel prices. Historically this hasn’t necessarily meant a rise in the sale of small cars. People said one thing about their intentions in surveys but that wasn’t what they actually did. The medium small Focus, Astra, Golf sector remained the most popular.

The reason car buyers have said one thing and done another in the past is although a car has to be affordable it also has to suit a buyers’ lifestyle. Over the past four decades small cars have grown from 3.5m to near 4m increasing their interior space and safety. Today small car sales are edging to the fore.

What is surprising is the renewed interest in the Crossover, SUV, 4×4 sector. This sector near died a death by 2007 because of running costs but has been rescued by the Crossover car concept. A Crossover car is built like a car – not a truck – and drives more like a car with more car like running costs.

It seems car buyers believe Crossovers, SUVs and 4x4s are suited to their lifestyle and are now a consideration as they become financially viable. The Nissan Qashqai’s amazing success is a good example.

The Nissan Qashqai replaced their Almera which competed in the most popular Focus, Astra, Golf sector. The Qashqai is an interesting alternative to the ubiquitous family hatchback.

A Qashqai is built on a Renault Megane platform as is the Renault Scenic but the Qashqai does not have the versatility of MPVs so why the interest? Without going into explaining the body styles of estate cars, SUVs and MPVs the main difference is the Qashqai has a prominent horizontal bonnet as opposed to one box MPV style with a steeply sloped windscreen merging into a sloping bonnet.

I can’t analyse the attraction of a prominent bonnet, maybe it’s an indication of a big powerful engine under the hood or perceived frontal crash protection. Certainly Ford have latched onto this style feature with the new C-Max having a more distinctive bonnet more like the Kuga than the old C-Max.

I seems against all reason SUVs should compete with more versatile MPVs when it comes to cars suiting lifestyles. However Crossovers have improved SUV versatility. The interest in Crossovers, SUVs and 4x4s seems to be a combination of being an alternative to the ubiquitous hatchback, with near MPV versatility and 4×4 macho styling.

What nearly killed the SUV sector was the viability of running the things. Vehicles like the RAV4, CR-V, Freelander followed by the Tiguan have managed to survive but with entry prices £20,000 or more it’s a bit of a stretch from the price of a family hatch.

Although the Qashqai costs more than a Megane it’s close enough to be considered. What has really racked up the interest in Crossovers is lower priced entrants into the market like the Hyundai ix35, Kia Sportage, Mitsubishi ASX and Skoda Yeti.

All the new entrants have the 4×4 style, adequate – not MPV – versatility in the dimensions of a Ford Focus. This makes them strong contenders as cars to suit people’s lifestyles.

If you compare their performance, emissions and fuel consumption with traditional 4x4s the improvements are amazing. However they don’t come close to the new improved efficiency of the everyday family hatchback. But maybe that’s not the comparison being made. They could be comparing Crossovers with the cars they are replacing.

Car sales have been poor since 2007 with owners postponing changing their cars which are most likely to be reliable and durable enough to hold onto. If their car is something like a Focus, Astra, Scenic, Zafira then their versatility probably still suits, whilst engine efficiency and general running costs have been good enough. Who’d pay thousands even tens of thousands to change their cars for the same type of car with small improvements?

However a Crossover is different, might suit their lifestyle and is now more affordable. It will be interesting to see when car sales pick up if interest in the Crossover sector will manifest itself in sales as it has done with the Qashqai.

Certainly there are deals to be done with dealers offering heavy discounts and low rate finance. If you ask for even more discount and better finance rates you may well get them. Just be sure you also get a good price for your part-exchange and discount on add-ons. Don’t be swayed by one of these for deals, you need the best on all four.

Four things you need to check:

• Get the latest EuroNCAP rating for new entrants into the market – you need 5-stars and ESP/ESC.
• The elevated view of the road from a Crossover has many advantages but be sure you’re happy with the cars’ higher centre of gravity, it’s stability and handling.
• When considering different engine and trim options be aware of the changes in car insurance groups and the differences in premiums.
• If you consider diesel engines compare it with a similar performing petrol engine and calculate at what total mileage savings in fuel costs repay the extra you pay for a diesel car.

Regards
Ralph
carbuyersinfo.co.uk. car comparison website to help you find the car to suit your purpose and purse

Has the Nissan Qashqai got any competition?

The Nissan Qashqai has been amazingly successful in the UK.  It was one of the first Crossovers to be launched just at the time SUVs became the kiss of death in 2006/7.

If we asked the question, ‘has the Qashqai got any competitors in its class?’ We have to ask, ‘what class of car is it?’ OK it’s a Crossover however so is a 3008 and XC60 but the similarity ends with them being called Crossovers.

It all comes down to style. An XC60 looks like a 4×4 SUV, a 3008 looks more like an MPV. Where does that leave the Qashqai?

The Qashqai replaced the Nissan Almera which was a family hatchback like the Focus, Astra, Golf, Megane. The Nissan Qashqai is built on a Renault Megane platform so it can simply be seen as a very interesting alternative to a ubiquitous Focus etc. What’s interesting is it doesn’t look like an everyday hatch. It’s different.

The Qashqai is built like a Renault Scenic which is also on a Megane platform so a Qashqai could be seen as an MPV but it couldn’t hold a candle to a Scenic for space and versatility which is what an MPV promises. Plus the Qashqai doesn’t look like an MPV because it has horizontal bonnet like a SUV, not a steep windscreen merging into a sloping bonnet like an MPV. A SUV is a two box style, an MPV has a one box appearance.

So a Qashqai doesn’t look like a family hatch or an MPV. It looks more like a SUV. Nearly all SUVs launched since 2006 are built as Crossovers on car platforms, not like old SUVs built on truck platforms. Personally, I think these new-comers are marketed as SUVs because they make more money in the market. A Kuga is on a Focus platform but it’s not Focus money. A Tiguan is on a Golf platform but it’s not Golf money.

A Nissan Qashqai is on a Megane platform and it’s not far off Megane money.

So a Qashqai doesn’t look like a hatch or MPV. It looks more like a SUV. Although its built on a hatch platform like an MPV. The big difference is a Qashqai is a viable alternative to a hatch or MPV with SUV style which is perceived and in most cases does cost more than a hatch or MPV. The Qashqai looks a bit of value.

To find cars to compete with the Qashqai we need to look at SUVs priced nearer hatchback prices less than £20,000 plus. This knocks out contenders which first spring to mind like the Captiva, Kuga, Freelander, and Tiguan because they’re too much money. The 3008 looks more like an MPV to me.

However the Hyundai ix35, Kia Sportage, Mitsubishi ASX and Skoda Yeti all enter the market with prices near enough to those of popular hatchbacks. The attraction of these cars is they’re different from a Focus or Astra.

How do they match up to a Nissan Qashqai?

Price

Hyundai ix35 – £16605 to £23865
Kia Sportage – £17020 to £26755
Mitsubishi ASX – £15999 to £24399
Nissan Qashqai – £17595 to £23645
Skoda Yeti – £14645 to £23895

Overall length and minimum/maximum load capacity

Hyundai ix35 – 4.41m, 591(l), 1436 (l)
Kia Sportage – 4.44, 564,1353
Mitsubishi ASX – 4.3, 442, 1193
Nissan Qashqai – 4.32/52, 410, 1520
Skoda Yeti – 4.22, 416, 1760

Combined fuel consumption, emissions, maximum speed and acceleration 0-62 mph

Hyundai ix35 1.6 2WD – 44.1 mpg, 149 CO2, 111 mph, 11.1 seconds
Kia Sportage 1.6 2WD – 44.1 mpg, 149 CO2, 111 mph, 10.7 seconds
Mitsubishi ASX 1.6 2WD – 47.9 mpg, 135 CO2, 113 mph, 11.4 seconds
Nissan Qashqai 1.6 2WD – 42.8 mpg, 154 CO2, 112 mph, 12.9 seconds
Skoda Yeti 1.2 2WD – 44.1 mpg, 149 CO2, 109 mph, 11.8 seconds

The Yeti has the lowest entry price, then the ASX. The Yeti is the most compact with the largest maximum load space. All five rank closely for engine efficiency to the point there may be no difference in real on the road driving conditions.

Style and driver comfort are matters for your personal taste. These cars may not have the brand equity of a Land Rover however Hyundai, Kia and Skoda outrank most premium brands for customer satisfaction. Nissan and Mitsubishi have built their own band of loyal followers over decades and both have a reputation for making highly capable 4x4s and high performance super cars.

Obviously this is just a quick guide, but yes the Qashqai launched a successful concept so it was always going to attract competition. All are viable and interesting alternatives to ubiquitous hatchbacks.

Regards
Ralph
carbuyersinfo.co.uk. car comparisons revealing similarities and differences to help find the right car for your purpose and purse

Mitsubishi ASX vs Kia Sportage

Yesterday we compared the Sportage with the ix35 and as expected there’s not too much difference. So how does the ASX compare with the Sportage and therefore the very similar ix35? We also calculated a petrol engine Sportage is a viable proposition. Is the ASX petrol worth considering?

The Mitsubishi ASX is like the Sportage a crossover SUV built like a car. It couldn’t be more different from that truck of a thing, the Shogun. The Shogun was – with Nissan, Toyota – guilty of getting the UK hooked on big bad SUVs back in the 80s. The ASX probably benefits from many fond memories and from owners who loved their SUV but are reconsidering their need for 4×4 and a big car today although they still like the SUV body style.

The ASXs prestige – for want of a better word – and the fact Mitsubishi make some highly capable performance cars isn’t an issue for Kia. Kia have built a large following of loyal customers who only have good things to say about the brand. They can’t be dismissed as a value brand because Kia meet their customers’ expectations, first time – which defines quality.

Let’s look at the numbers.

The ASX enters the market over £1000 cheaper than the Sportage. Yes, I’ve got that the right way round.

The ASX is about six inches short of the Sportage in length and its 442(l) boot is a big suitcase short of the Sportage 564(l). With the rear seats folded the ASX has 1193(l) the Sportage 1353(l). For those who like the SUV style but no longer need the size or maximum space its’ worth continuing to consider the ASX. If space is important the longer Sportage may be more suitable.

Both cars have a 1.6 petrol 2WD option. On paper the ASX is more economical, cleaner with no significant difference in performance. However these are lab’ figures and as the two rank closely for fuel consumption there may be little difference on the road. The ASX does not have a 2.0 petrol option.

The ASX 1.8 diesel and Sportage 1.7 diesel 2WD options again rank closely for fuel consumption however the ASX is significantly faster and quicker. It’s the same story for both ASX 1.8, Sportage 2.0 diesel AWD drive options. It’s nice to have the extra feeling of power in the ASX when not at the expense of mpg. Obviously ragging it to 62mph in under 10 seconds and cruising at 124 mph will not return the combined 51.4 mpg.

The ASX 1.6 petrol 2WD has a 47.9 combined mpg. At £6.22 a gallon it would cost £1558 to cover 12000 miles.

The ASX 1.8 2WD with diesel costing £6.45 gallon would cost £1505 for 12k.

You would save £53 per year with the diesel by my calculations. You pay a £2200 premium for a diesel ASX . You need to do half a million miles to justify the diesel on the basis of fuel economy. The issue is the ASX petrol is just that bit too good.

The diesel ASX is a consideration for those who want the added performance and a feeling of power. I always think a diesel engine feels like petrol with 50% more litres. So a 1.8 diesel feels to me like 2.7 petrol which is very different from 1.6 petrol.

If you take both the ASX and Sportage and compare them with the popular, more expensive Land Rover Freelander - which must be the benchmark for compact SUVs, 4x4s – they’re a tad better on paper for fuel consumption, emissions and performance. However the Land Rover has a lot more space and a huge amount of brand equity.

If you’ve got better things to do with thousands of pounds than spend it on an Audi Q5 2.0 TDI 170 quattro both the ASX and Sportage are worth considering. They do amazingly well in paper comparisons for space, mpg, CO2s and performance. If you’ve got premium brand issues think Evo and CSI.

So differences between a Mitsubishi ASX forgetting the Kia Sportage 7-year warranty, put simply, ASX for a bit of fun, Sportage for a bit of family.

Regards
Ralph
see full details at Kia Sportage vs Mitsubishi ASX carbuyersinfo.co.uk car comparison site revealing differences and similarities to help find the car to suit your purpose and purse

Hyundai ix35 vs Kia Sportage

 The ix35 and Sportage are creating a lot of interest in the Crossover sector. A Crossover is a SUV style body built on a light-weight car platform unlike older SUVs which were built like heavy trucks.

Crossovers are more economical, greener, handle better and usually much safer in terms of accident prevention and protection. Many enter with 2WD and AWD as an optional model. AWD is not as capable as all-terrain 4×4, they’re called soft-roaders rather than off-roaders.

Here we look at the Crossover Hyundai ix35 vs Kia Sportage, you might also consider the Mitsubishi ASX.

These three Crossovers are keenly priced to the extent they can be a viable alternative to the ubiquitous family hatchback. Some might consider them fun and a bit more interesting. The ix35 started at £16605 the Sportage at £17020 in April. Most other Crossovers start near £20000.

There’s a tiny difference in the overall length of the Sportage and ix35 at 4.44m and 4.41m respectively. As 5-seaters the Sportage has 564(l) load space the ix35 591 – a big hold-all difference. You get 1353 and 1436(l) maximum load space – one suitcase.

The engine options are similar although you have a 2.0 petrol AWD manual or automatic option with the Sportage. The ix35 has a 2.0 CRDi2WD option. Other engines appear to be the same. There’s an insignificant difference between 2WD and AWD for economy, emissions, top speed and acceleration. Automatic transmission is a little more juicy.

It’s interesting Crossovers still offer petrol engine options. Many SUVs and 4x4s are now only available with diesel engines with no petrol options. This suggests diesel is the most viable option. But is it? Certainly in small cars and family hatchbacks you need to be a high mileage driver to make enough fuel savings to cover the added cost of a diesel car.

So whats the difference in costs between a Kia Sportage diesel and petrol?

A Sportage 1.6 2WD ISG is a tiny bit quicker than a 1.7 diesel 2WD ISG but the petrol has a combined 44.1 mpg, the diesel 54.3 mpg. The 2.0 petrol AWD manual and 2.0 diesel AWD have a similar difference 37.2/49.6 respectively.

Today a Sportage 1.6 GDi 2WD is £17295 and 1.7 CRDI 2WD is £18695. A premium of £1400 for the diesel.

Petrol costs £1.369p per litre £6.22 per gallon, diesel £1.419p per litre £6.45 per gallon.

12,000 miles/44.1 mpg = 272 gallons of petrol costing £1691.84.

12.000 miles/54.3 mpg = 221 gallons of diesel costing £1425.45.

Every 12,000 miles the diesel saves £266.39 in fuel costs.

The premium paid for a car £1400/266.39×12000 miles will take 63065 miles to recover.

If you do 12000 miles per year that’s 5-years. So petrol is a consideration.

There is the argument when you part exchange a diesel car you might get more for it. It is likely to be the case with a SUV or 4×4. It’s questionable for small cars and medium size family hatchback. However nobody can predict the used car market 5-years down the road. The used car market is a real market with many buyers and sellers.

The combined mpg is a figure achieved in a lab’ for the DVLA and not necessarily what a car will return on the road given various driving styles and conditions. Out of interest a Ford Focus 1.6 petrol has 47.9 combined mpg, diesel  67.3 mpg.

The main differences between a ix35 and Sportage is Hyundai come with a 5-year warranty, Kia with 7-years. The Kia Sportage also has higher priced specifications at the top end of their range.

If you are considering a Crossover please calculate for yourself the difference between running a petrol or diesel.

Regards
Ralph
carbuyersinfo.co.uk car comparison site revealing differences and similarities to help find the right car for you. Discover which Crossover, SUV, 4×4 suits your purpose and purse.